Cultivating a responsible innovation mindset among future tech leaders

Like Prometheus gifting fire, technological innovation has long symbolised promise and progress. But public discourse around big tech is increasingly dystopian – whether it’s headlines about AI systems hallucinating false information or whistleblowers revealing how algorithms amplify harmful content. This shift towards scepticism highlights an urgent need to integrate ethics and technology where the next generation of technology and business leaders are shaped.

University educators play a crucial role in guiding students to think about the next big invention and its implications for privacy, the environment and social equity. To truly make a difference, we need to bring ethics and responsibility into the classroom in a way that resonates with students. Here’s how.

Allow students to debate with industry pioneers

The classroom is a perfect setting for exploring technology’s messy, real-world consequences. Beyond the technical “How?”, students should be debating questions such as: “Should we…?” and “What if…?” Weighing benefits such as security and efficiency against issues such as privacy and surveillance should become instinctive.

Debating with industry pioneers on incorporating ethical frameworks in innovation, product development or technology adoption is eye-opening because it can lead to students confronting assumptions they hadn’t questioned before. For example, students could discuss the roll-out of emotion-recognition software. Many assume it’s neutral, but guest speakers from industry can highlight how cultural and racial biases are baked into design decisions. 

• In the AI era, how do we battle cognitive laziness in students?
• Guard rails to mitigate ethical concerns for AI use
• When to eschew AI in teaching and research

Leveraging alumni networks and starting with short virtual Q&A sessions instead of full lectures can work well. Framing it as a mutual learning opportunity also helps; guests often enjoy hearing how students interpret their dilemmas. A key challenge will be shifting these sessions from passive listening to active dialogue. An idea would be to pre-assign students into groups representing distinct stakeholder positions, such as public sector regulator, start-up chief technology officer, data ethics watchdog or consumer advocacy group. Each team researches their stance ahead of time and prepares questions or challenges to raise during the session.

Use assignments to encourage ethical reflection

The use of generative AI tools in student assignments is increasingly taken for granted. Our assignments must, therefore, dig deeper into context, critique and personal development.

We’ve been experimenting with a layered approach. Take the “ethical post-mortem” format, for example. Students investigate a failed innovation – not just what happened but how and why ethical blind spots contributed to the outcome. Students can use AI to generate a first-draft response, but the assignment doesn’t stop there. They then respond in their own voice, identifying gaps, missed stakeholder perspectives or flawed reasoning in the AI’s output. Their reflection is not about agreeing or disagreeing but exposing what the AI overlooked – and why it matters. To ensure depth, we add a component that AI cannot simulate: a personal learning log. Students document how their understanding evolved during the task, what they found difficult to resolve, and where their own values came into play. This helps shift the emphasis from the answer to the learning process itself.

To assess this kind of work, we mark for reasoning, originality and intellectual openness. Did they confront uncertainty? Did they grapple with uncomfortable trade-offs? Did their position change? In a world where AI can offer plausible answers, it’s each student’s own questions and growth that matter most.

Connect students with other disciplines

Ethics doesn’t live in a tech bubble. Solutions often come from blending tech with other areas (for example, social sciences, environmental studies or philosophy). By linking tech courses with classes from different fields, educators give students a more complete view of what responsible innovation means.

One way forward may not be to teach more but to connect in a smarter way. Rather than rely on informal invitations, institutions could map overlapping curriculum topics across departments once a year and set up a light-touch “matchmaking” process to connect lecturers with shared interests. Similarly, capstone projects and design challenges could integrate ethical feedback from internal experts, turning passive guest lectures into dynamic cross-faculty engagement.

Get out of the classroom

Some lessons simply won’t sink in until students are faced with real-world complexity. Partnering with companies or local organisations gives students hands-on experience with the ethical and social challenges they’ll encounter in their careers. One model we’ve employed in the Distributed Ledger Technology Innovation & Ecosystem Management (DIEM) project for our PhD students, and we’re scaling down for our undergraduate programmes, is a structured “ethical challenge lab”: a short-format, challenge-led exercise embedded in an existing course (such as a mini hackathon).

A local organisation submits a short recorded briefing (up to 10 minutes) posing a challenge they’re actively facing. It might sound like: “Our app collects continuous health data but users don’t read the consent forms. How can we design a clearer interface that earns trust without losing engagement?” or “We want to launch a clothing take-back programme, but most of the collected garments can’t be recycled. How do we design a system that’s more than greenwashing?”

Students work in small groups over one or two sessions to propose a response. They're not expected to solve the problem fully but to frame it clearly, highlight the tensions and offer responsible paths forward, combining ethical awareness with practical constraints. The company then selects the most insightful or actionable submission. 

For students, it’s an opportunity to test their thinking against the real concerns of decision-makers. For partners, it’s a low-cost way to pressure-test ideas and hear from voices outside the room.

Set the example

Of course, for students to take this seriously, educators need to set the example. A lecturer who openly discusses their own experiences with ethical dilemmas sends a clear message: this is worth your attention. When educators are open about the challenges they face, whether it’s in choosing fair grading policies or confronting ethical conflicts in their research, they show students that grappling with responsibility is a lifelong process. This is a great opportunity for research-led teaching, especially in postgraduate programmes.

Faculty can also collaborate across departments to build a curriculum that supports these principles. Universities that prioritise interdisciplinary discussions, hands-on projects and personal reflection are laying the groundwork for students to think critically about the impact of their work, even beyond their time at school.

Beyond skills to mindset

For this integration to take root, university curricula must go beyond technical skills to foster a mindset that questions the broader impacts of innovation. Through my work on the Redesigning Education for Ethical Digitalisation (REED) project, I actively discussed with stakeholders best practices for enhancing our courses and assessments with relevant and impactful content. The REED platform will be offering such plug-and-play educational content freely in the coming months. 

Students need more than just skills; they need a mindset that sticks with them long after graduation. By making ethics and responsibility a key part of the learning process, educators are doing more than preparing students for a career; they’re preparing them to navigate a world shaped by their choices.

Andreas Alexiou is associate professor of strategy and digital innovation in the department of strategy, innovation and entrepreneurship at Southampton Business School at the University of Southampton.